I have participated in the Gravity Research Foundation contest 3 times. For some reason, they accept amateur submissions yet only the authorized accredited submissions place or win until someone can verify otherwise. The papers were properly formatted; I played by the rules. Did my submission aid their grant structure? I would receive certification such as "we are in receipt of your manuscript". As there is no process of review or thesis analysis, the procedure lacks transparency and has proven to be of no value towards further enrichment. I worked hard to edit the papers the proper word requirement and have no idea as to the identities of this secret cabal. Meanwhile at Green Apple Bookstore on Clement Street, I thumbed through the story of a man actually grateful to be included in a fixed grant cull, he could guarantee would gain him no progress. I assumed the contest was on my email by default, but when I requested they send no more materials, after my last failed submission, they obliged.
Lisa Randall provided inaccurate information on her appearance on the Charlie Rose show stating that there is no feedback mechanism in physics as in the biological sciences. Besides the obvious glitch of offering no clarification of which amino acid valence emulsion cleaves left of physics or right of biology, she forgot to address helicity correlated systematics both within the static and high spin group limit. A second order or third derivational angular displacement correction, probe, target, beam yields what one man at the BNL labeled the mnemonic limit which yields a logic flaw because procedural redundancy can yield identical consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment